Mission Statement
  & Core Values

District Information
Directions
Staff Directory
FAQ
General Contacts
Governing Board
News & Press Releases
Office Hours
Valley Air Newsletter
Videos
Ag Permits/Conservation
 Management Practices(CMP)

Ag Burning
Dairy Permitting
Smoke Management System
Weed Abatement Burning
File a Complaint
Smoking Vehicles
Wood Burning Forecast
Air Alerts
Air Quality Info
Daily Forecast
Exceptional Events
Real-Time Air Advisory
 Network (RAAN)

Carbon Monoxide
Emission Inventory
Fast Track Strategy
Health Risk-Reduction Strategy
Ozone Plans
Particulate Matter Plans
Make a Payment
Small Business Assistance
eTrip
Requests for Proposals (RFPs)
Abrasive Blasting
Asbestos
Breakdowns
Compliance Assistance
 Bulletins

Dust Control
Fireplaces, Stoves,
 and Heaters

Gasoline Dispensing (GDF)
Hazard Reduction Burning
INSPECT Program
Notice of Violation (NOV)
Policies/Guidance Documents
Prescribed Burning
Record Keeping Forms
Solvent Degreasing
Source Testing
State Portable Equipment
Title V
Training Schedule
Variances
Weed Abatement Burning
Calendar Contest
Curriculum
Healthy Air Living Schools
Games and Activities
Real-Time Air Advisory
 Network (RAAN)

Budget & Financial
Email Lists
Information & Documents
Request A Speaker
Public Records Requests
California Environmental
 Quality Act (CEQA)

Climate Change Action Plan
Demolition Permit Release
Guidelines for General Plans
Indirect Source Review
Emissions/Air Quality Models
Air Quality Mitigation
Transportation
Air Quality Modeling
Air Toxics
Emission Factor
Emissions Inventory
Resources
Make Payments
Application Forms
Air Toxics
Ag Permits/Conservation
 Management Practices(CMP)

Best Available Control
 Technology (BACT)

Best Performance
 Standard (BPS)

Dairy Permitting
Drought Relief Actions
Emission Reduction
 Credits(ERC)

eTrip
General Permitting Info
Permit-Exempt Equipment
 Registration (PEER)

Portable Equipment
Public Notification
Small Business Assistance
Title V Operating Permits
Citizens Advisory Committee
Calendar of Events
Conferences
Environmental Justice
  Advisory Group

Governing Board
Hearing Board
Special City Selection
  Committee

Study Agency
Workshops & Hearings
Webcasts
Email Lists
Healthy Air Living
Public Notices
Public Records Release  Request
Receive Permit Notice
Upcoming Events
Workshops & Hearings
Current Rules
Recent Actions
Rules Main
Rules Under Development
File a Complaint
Healthy Air Living
Learn About Air Pollution
Upcoming Events
Wood Burning
Air Quality Modeling: Permitting & CEQA

Quick Links

The District no longer accepts analyses performed using the Industrial Source Complex –
Short-Term (ISCST3) model.

All meteorological data have been processed with AERMET, Version 06341.

Meteorological Data (Only for use in the AERMOD model)

All meteorological data sets are draft at this time but should be used for any modeling of sources in the San Joaquin Valley. Please download the latest data sets before modeling. Use the most recent five years of meteorological data. Model all five years. Use all the data available for a site if less than five years of data are available. For a cancer or a chronic non-cancer risk assessment, the average cancer risk of all years modeled should be used. If concatenated data sets are used for an analysis of compliance with ambient air quality standards, the 5-year average concentration obtained by running a concatenated data set shall be multiplied by a factor of 1.5 except for Bakersfield, Hanford, and Modesto. For those three data sets, a factor of 1.75 shall be used. If a violation of an annual average standard is predicted using this approach, the project can be remodeled using each year's data set. Then, the maximum annual average concentration predicted will be compared to annual average standard.

Meteorological data are available from two sources: 1) the National Climatological Data Center (NCDC) and 2) the MM5 Numerical Model. NCDC data were collected at major airports in the Valley. These data can be used for health risk assessments and ambient air quality analyses. The data derived from the MM5 numerical model are for sites where there are no airports. These sites are in the western part of the Valley. MM5- derived data can be used for health risk assessments. They cannot be used for ambient air quality analyses.

National Climatological Data Center
(Airports)

Bakersfield
Fresno
Hanford
Madera
Modesto
Stockton
Lemoore
Merced
Porterville
Visalia

Meteorological Data Derived from MM5 Numerical Modeling

Fellows
Los Banos
Missouri Triangle
Tracy
Turk


Back to top

Ozone Data (Only for use in the AERMOD model)**

To use file click on link and pick Save As to save to your PC

County

For information about each of these sites please refer to ARB's Quality Assurance Air Monitoring Site Information.

Back to top

Nitrogen Dioxide Data (Only for use in performing a Tier IV or paired sums analysis)**

To use file click on link and pick Save As to save to your PC

County

To download the District’s guidance on developing “EPA’s NO2 Modeling Background Datasets”. Click here.

For information about each of these sites please refer to ARB's Quality Assurance Air Monitoring Site Information.

Contact the District before performing a Tier IV or paired sums analysis!

Back to top

Monitoring Background Values

1-Hour NO2

The District has processed the NO2 monitoring data for all sites located within the San Joaquin Valley using the guidance provided in Appendix S of Part 50. A detailed description of the District’s procedure and a summary of the data used can be downloaded here.

County Site Name 3yr Ave. of the 98th percentile of the annual distribution of the daily 1 hour max ppb / ug/m3
Fresno Fresno-Drummond Street 61.00 / 115.10
Fresno Fresno-1st Street 56.67 / 106.92
Fresno Fresno-Sierra Skypark #2 45.67 / 85.31
Fresno Parlier 39.33 / 74.21
Fresno Clovis-N Villa Avenue 58.67 / 110.70
Kern Edison 40.00 / 75.47
Kern Bakersfield-Golden State Highway 60.00 / 113.21
Kern Bakersfield-5558 California Avenue 61.00 / 115.10
Kern Arvin-Bear Mountain Blvd 31.67 / 59.76
Kern Shafter-Walker Street 53.33 / 100.62
Kings Hanford-S Irwin Street 53.00 / 100.00
Madera Madera-Pump Yard 40.33 / 76.10
Merced Merced-S Coffee Avenue 43.33 / 81.76
San Joaquin Stockton-Hazelton Street 57.67 / 108.81
San Joaquin Tracy-Airport 38.67 / 72.96
Stanislaus Turlock-S Minaret Street 48.67 / 91.83
Tulare Visalia-N Church Street 61.33 / 115.72

1-Hour SO2

The District has processed the SO2 monitoring data for all sites located within the San Joaquin Valley using the guidance provided in Appendix T of Part 50.

County Site Name 3yr Ave. of the 99th percentile of the annual distribution of the daily 1 hour max ppb / ug/m3
Fresno Fresno-1st Street 7.33 / 19.20

Other Background Values

All other background values can be downloaded from EPA at http://www.epa.gov/airdata/ad_rep_mon.html.

Corrections

Date County/City Monitor Comment
8-19-10 Fresno/Fresno 1st Street It was recently noted that CARB incorrectly reported SO2 monitoring data to EPA. In previous submittals the data was submitted as parts per 100 million instead of parts per billion. Data on CARB’s website has been updated and corrections have been submitted to EPA. At the current time data at EPA, using the link under “Other Background Values”, has not yet been updated.
---- Fresno/Fresno 1st Street

On 4 and 5 July 2007, there was an unusual event in Fresno. Because of very stagnant meteorological conditions with high ambient temperatures, this site was unduly affected by emissions from fireworks. The District has filed a report under EPA’s Natural Events Policy to exclude ozone and particulate matter data collected on those dates from use in determining attainment of the federal standards. Therefore the following sulfur dioxide concentrations should be used for background:

1-hr max: 0.13 ppm
3-hr max: 0.075 ppm
24-hr max 0.031 ppm
Annual Average: 0.007 ppm

Back to top

Modeling Guidance

Back to top

Modeling Resources

 
AERMOD Modeling System Hot Spots Analysis and Reporting Program (HARP)
EPA Modeling Guidance Health Risk Assessment (HRA) Guidance
CALINE4 CO Protocol
PM10 Protocol  
 

All health risk assessments must comply with the Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment’s (OEHHA’s) guidelines. Any methodology that does not use HARP must be reviewed by ARB and/or OEHHA prior to submission to the District to ensure that OEHHA’s guidelines are fully implemented.

Back to top