Back

Best Available Control Technology (BACT ) Guideline 1.9.17
Last Update: 1/30/2017


Stationary Air Curtain Incinerator
Pollutant Achieved in Practice or in the SIP Technologically Feasible Alternate Basic Equipment
VOCAir curtain incinerator (electric powered), complying with visible emissions of 10% opacity or less after start-up (per 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart CCCC, sections 60.2250 and 60.2255)1. Biomass Power Plant 2. Landfill 3. Composting
NOxAir curtain incinerator (electric powered), complying with visible emissions of 10% opacity or less after start-up (per 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart CCCC, sections 60.2250 and 60.2255)1. Biomass Power Plant 2. Landfill 3. Composting
PM10Air curtain incinerator (electric powered), complying with visible emissions of 10% opacity or less after start-up (per 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart CCCC, sections 60.2250 and 60.2255)1. Biomass Power Plant 2. Landfill 3. Composting
SOxAir curtain incinerator (electric powered), complying with visible emissions of 10% opacity or less after start-up (per 40 CFR Part 60 Subpart CCCC, sections 60.2250 and 60.2255)1. Biomass Power Plant 2. Landfill 3. Composting


BACT is the most stringent control technique for the emissions unit and class of source. Control techniques that are not achieved in practice or contained in s a state implementation plan must be cost effective as well as feasible. Economic analysis to demonstrate cost effectiveness is requried for all determinations that are not achieved in practice or contained in an EPA approved State Implementation Plan.

This is a Summary Page for this Class of Source. For background information, see Permit Specific BACT Determinations on Details Page.