Best Available Control Technology (BACT ) Guideline 3.3.15|
Last Update: 3/6/2013
Waste Gas-Fired IC Engine**
|Pollutant||Achieved in Practice or in the SIP||Technologically Feasible||Alternate Basic Equipment|
|Ammonia (NH3) Slip||< or = 10 ppmv @ 15% O2|
|CO||2.0 g/bhp-hr||1. Fuel Cells (<0.10 lb/MW-hr) 2. Microturbines (<60 ppmv @ 15% O2) 3. Gas Turbine (<60 ppmv @ 15% O2) (Note: gas turbines only ABE for projects > or = 3 MW)|
|Nox||0.15 g/bhp-hr (lean-burn engine with SCR, rich-burn engine with 3-way catalyst, or other equivalent)||1. Fuel Cells (<0.05 lb/MW-hr) 2. Microturbines (<9 ppmv @ 15% O2) 3. Gas Turbine (<9 ppmv @ 15% O2) (Note: gas turbines only ABE for projects > or = to 3 MW)|
|PM10||Sulfur content of fuel gas < or = 40 ppmv (as H2S)|
|Sox||Sulfur content of fuel gas < or = 40 ppmv (as H2S) (dry absorption, wet absorption, chemical H2S reduction, water scrubber, or equivalent) (may be averaged up to 24 hours for compliance)|
|VOC||0.10 g/bhp-hr (lean burn and positive crankcase ventilation (PCV) or a 90% efficient crankcase control device or equivalent)||Fuel Cells (<0.02 lb-VOC/MW-hr as CH4)|
**For the purposes of this determination, waste gas is a gas produced from the digestion of material excluding municipal sources such as waste water treatment plants, landfills, or any source where siloxane impurities are a concern|
BACT is the most stringent control technique for the emissions unit and class of source. Control techniques that are not achieved in practice or contained in s a state implementation plan must be cost effective as well as feasible. Economic analysis to demonstrate cost effectiveness is requried for all determinations that are not achieved in practice or contained in an EPA approved State Implementation Plan.
This is a Summary Page for this Class of Source. For background information, see Permit Specific BACT Determinations on Details Page.